Sort Date Most helpful Positive rating Negative rating. Please Wait. Submit Your Reply.
- hp photosmart c5380 drivers mac.
- MAC OS System on Basilisk | ToughDev!
- mac pages spelling correction in other languages.
- format factory pour mac os x gratuit!
- Publisher's Description.
- mac os x mavericks camera not working.
Summary: Count: 0 of 1, characters Submit cancel The posting of advertisements, profanity, or personal attacks is prohibited. Thank You for Submitting a Reply,! Note that your submission may not appear immediately on our site. E-mail This Review. E-mail this to: Enter the e-mail address of the recipient Add your own personal message: 0 of 1, characters Submit cancel. Thank You,! Report Offensive Content. Still reading this? Then you're a real tough fellow!
MAC OS System 8.0 on Basilisk
The orig. Mac version is close to something that might even be commercially released on a lightweight portable game platform today. Well, almost then I agree. It's a gorgeous game. I up-voted your post here earlier, but I wanted to wait until I could digest it's contents completely before I commented. This reference guide you put together really is streets ahead.
Seeing as how so many of the old Mac games relied on 8-bit color, this will likely serve as a great one-stop tutorial to all the Pi users out there left scratching their heads over this issue. I look forward to giving it a go myself and vanquishing the evil Jaffar once and for all. You'l need quite some Pi skills and Linux skills. Most of the fun must be sought in acquiring computer skills, not so much in playing PoP2, ha ha. I don't even know if it will run stand-alone though Good luck! Just a FYI to those who might try. By itself, this executable has dependencies that are not met.
Thanks for the link though. It was worth a shot, and I still look forward to using your guide in full when I get a little more time to experiment. I could also post the files it needs and tell you where they are installed. Do you get an error message and could you post it here? Maybe in the error mess tells what files it misses I do appreciate it, but it's probably best that it be compiled and installed as your guide intends or else we'll just be asking for trouble. I tried to run the BasiliskII executable from a location other than the standard location i.
It appears to need a config file i. Might save one the time and trouble of compiling it from source Last night, I was fortunate enough to stumble onto somewhat of a solution to this problem. Using the runcommand-onstart , we can now set the framebuffer to 8-bit color on launch by adding:.
HOWTO: Compile Sheepshaver from source.
With this enabled, games running in 8-bit color will now be visible. From here, I want to reset the default color depth on exit in the runcommand-onend script.
Am I correct in assuming that the default color depth is bit bit? Very keen! My childhood best friend had a Macintosh Plus. I think that was the first time I ever played 'Deja Vu'. Has SheepShaver ever been considered for Retropie? Just tested 'Prince of Persia 2: The Shadow and the Flame' and it runs like a champ with the framebuffer set to 8-bit color depth.
Basilisk II for Windows - 68K emulator w/ floppy support - Macintosh Repository
A runcommand setting would indeed be most helpful for games that require a higher color depth, as the screen now turns black when the emulated Mac is set to "Thousands of Colors". Running in Mac OS 8. Interestingly, both environments are nicely self-contained, and these can be run in parallel with each other without problem. Mini vMac was updated very recently on November 17th to version 3. Although it lacks most of the problems plaguing SheepShaver and Basilisk, it also lacks most of its features.
- monkey island 1 mac download free!
- BasiliskII - Debian Wiki?
- samsung ml-1710 mac os driver?
- Setting up your vintage (classic) 68k Macintosh – Using Basilisk II?
- Memory Problem in Basilisk II/SheepShaver - Macintosh Garden.
- globe wimax mac address december 2015;
- page background colour not printing word mac.
The only configuration option made available is in the selection of disks to be added to the running environment. Although a fine Mac Plus emulator, its interoperability with the rest of the system needs work. To answer this question, I downloaded the shareware Classic application Speedometer 4.
This application nicely allows tests to be formed in either PowerPC or 68K mode. I ran both tests on various hardware, including G4's, G5's and Intel boxes. The results did not change when switching between Tiger and Leopard. Speedometer 4. Thus, if a test result value is 2. Of these, the CPU score is the most important and indeed the most informative of the tests, following closely behind by the Math score. The Disk score was much less informative, as it tended to be the same across all emulators and Classic.
The Graphics test could not even be run at all on Tiger's Classic environment, as it requires the monochrome capabilities long since dropped from modern Macs although the SheepShaver and Basilisk were able to emulate this. For this reason, I will concentrate exclusively on CPU and Math scores, denoting them as a pair, so that " Speedometer 4 requires a processor or higher to operate, so no speed tests could be run on Mini vMac. I do not view this to be terribly inconvenient, since those interested in Mini vMac are not likely to be worried about performance.
However, casual use of Mini vMac shows it to be no slower than Basilisk in most cases, and in some instances faster. To my great surprise, SheepShaver's PowerPC performance relative to Classic depended greatly on the hardware it was running. On a Powerbook G4 1. Moving to a two processor system, much more interesting results are found. On a Power Mac G4 with Dual 1. At first, I thought the result was a fluke, but repeated tests bore this out. The screenshot below shows a typical example of SheepShaver beating Classic with a score of Possibly, SheepShaver's G4 emulator is a simple "pass-through" on this machine, possibly taking advantage of the second processor.
However, running the same test on a Power Mac G5 Dual 2. Despite the G5 system nearly double the speed of the aforementioned Dual G4, Classic's performance CPU scores remained about the same, whilst SheepShaver fell to half speed once again. In this screenshot example, Classic scored Also, the advantage of a second G5 processor did not seem to help SheepShaver as it did in the G4 case. The numbers go from disappointing to downright miserable when we move to the Intel platform. Although there is no Classic environment on Intel-based Macs, one might expect that SheepShaver's performance might improve due to its faster Xeon processor.
Unfortunately, the opposite is the case: without a native G4 processor to pass through, all PowerPC assembly calls must be emulated on an Intel machine. The only bright spot found here is in the Math score, which remains the same between the G5 and the Mac Pro. But how likely are G4's going to be upgraded to Leopard anyway?
- emulation - Linux 68k Macintosh emulator - Retrocomputing Stack Exchange!
- 1. Download and install Basilisk II.
- Conventional Steps to Uninstall Basilisk II 1.0.20091004 for Mac?
- Basilisk II.
- Apple Macintosh Quadra !
- mac proxy settings mountain lion.
- The Official Basilisk II Home Page.
For this reason, G4 users who still need Classic are probably less likely to upgrade to Leopard, and thus do not need SheepShaver. G5 users who do make the jump will find their Classic apps falling to half speed. Intel users who never had Classic to begin with are not likely to be attracted by SheepShaver's abysmal Intel performance.
Speedometer was set to run 68K tests. Instead, the results were much lower: 3. Basilisk fared worse, with a mere 3. Why these numbers are out of proportion is hard to explain. The only thing I can guess is that the G4 instructions most used by the 68K emulator must be ones which SheepShaver and run more slowly. On this platform, Classic's 68K scores remained relatively unchanged with Note also that SheepShaver's Graphics test ran an order of magnitude faster than Basilisk's.
With Basilisk's limitation to Mac OS 8. Again, surprises await us as we change platforms. Running these tests on a Mac Pro, Basilisk begins to shine, weighing in at The reasons for this become clear when you realize that SheepShaver is performing double translation: It is running a 68K emulator on a G4 emulator on an Intel machine, whilst Basilisk can go directly from 68K to Intel.
But this is not the surprising piece. In other words, Intel Mac users interested in performance are better off finding 68K versions of their software to run on Basilisk than to use PowerPC versions on SheepShaver. For example, Microsoft Office 4. It emulates a G4 processor minus the MMU. Unlike what you might have heard, all of the items needed to run SheepShaver are freely and legally downloadable. You are not required to buy an old Macintosh and run some obscure ROM-reading application to use it. There are, however, three separate pieces to the puzzle that you will need to assemble to get SheepShaver operating.
The first piece is the SheepShaver software itself, which can be downloaded from its web site. The second piece needed is a compatible Macintosh ROM file. Unfortunately, not all such files are compatible with SheepShaver. However, one simple way to acquire a compatible ROM file is to obtain it directly from Apple. There are three free Macintosh updaters, each containing a SheepShaver-compatible ROM file, which may be downloaded from these locations:.
These links download installers containing packages called tome files. The Classic application TomeViewer can easily extract it. The third and final piece needed to run SheepShaver is the system software itself. Depending on the ROMs used, you can go as far back as System 7. The choice of System 7. Beginning with System 7. Users lacking access to any version of a Macintosh OS can at least be able to download this version. System 7. This is not likely to be a major inconvenience, as most people interested in using SheepShaver are long-time Classic users who probably have access to a later version of the system software anyway.