Then why don't we remove Ruby, Python and the whole bash shell from any desktop?
Questions tagged [synology]
Totally ridiculous. My ONLY regret? It's an outstanding mind mapping program Massive suckage there. The overwhelming danger from Java comes from enabling the browser plug-in. Unless you're manually downloading infected applets, having it inert on your computer doesn't hurt any more than any of the other run-times or application frameworks you might have installed Windows Scripting Host,.
NET, Python et al. As an IT guy, I have to deal with a number of tools that still expect me to have Java, so I just have to make sure to keep it up to date. I do this by scripting updates with application repositories such as Chocolatey. On Windows, the Java Control Panel applet provides a unified interface for enabling and disabling Java access in browsers. For people who still need Java for applications e.
App Center :: QNAP
DirSync Pro or Filebot , this is the setting that allows the greatest safety for its use. Firefox isn't going to be giving up NSAPI any time soon; it's also the component of that browser that allows for Flash which we also hate but mostly still kind of want and third party PDF viewers to display content in a browser window. I realize that Firefox is in the process of becoming Chrome with a different rendering engine, but for the time being it does not have an alternative plugin architecture.
If java is dropped, what would be its replacement? Yes exactly my point!!!! I do as of now myself play on pogo. Libre Office and Open Office do use Java, but crucially they do not run in a browser environment so do not utilise the java browser plugin which is where the design flaw exists, Java itself is not inherently insecure as stated in the article.
Unfortunately, so does Minecraft. The difference is that, at least in Windows, the Java it requires is bundled with Minecraft supposedly to be used just for Minecraft alone. I don't know if it is as unsecure or not, but outside of Minecraft I have been able to remove it from my system. Windows 10, Minecraft didn't want to work graphic drivers issue so I have been using the Mobile version Windows 10 Beta so as far as I know, I do not have Java running on it and I am losing nothing. There are way too many things that still use Java that haven't updated their plugins.
Their answer is typically, "use a different browser". Top Deals. Email Facebook Whatsapp Pinterest Twitter. Enjoyed this article?
- Synology Community!
- Synology Storage and NAS questions (and request for help)!
The mydlink app can be downloaded from the App store or Android market. For PC and Mac users, mydlink. One caveat to using the mydlink. In fact Apple has started to block Java on their last two OS X iterations for these security reasons. The wizard was straightforward with illustrations to help guide the installation process. The only real choices you have to make are whether to setup the Cloud Camera as a wired or wireless camera and if you wish to sign up for the mydlink service.
Here are the views through the iOS mydlink lite app viewing portrait and landscape orientations in regular and infrared views. The controls through the app allow you to pan and tilt the camera, increase the magnification up to 4x, listen or mute audio, image capture. Swiping to the right provides a screen to change resolutions but only the p was available on my screen initially.
- filezilla ftp free download for mac;
- Synology DSM 6.0 – Release Notes.
- eject key on mac wireless keyboard.
- free blank receipt template for mac.
- longhorns steakhouse mac and cheese recipe!
- Average One Million Downloads Every Month.
In terms of responsiveness, the app and camera have some lag when trying to pan and tilt the camera remotely. Several times I had to press the on screen buttons before the camera would move seconds later on my iPhone 5. Another issue I had with the Cloud Camera and remote viewing was at times I was unable to connect to the camera remotely whether I was in or outside my home network. While I'm a more prosumer user, it's not a one-stop solution for me but I still readily use and value it. Very, very well done Google. Stammy, why would you even consider a NAS?
Wouldn't it be risky to store all of your precious photos on a device in your house that could fail, be stolen, lost in a fire, or simply erased due to one heinous configuration or command line mix up? Well let's put aside the disk failure issue. Modern 4-drive NAS systems can tolerate a lost drive and alert you promptly to replace it.
You'd have to have pretty bad luck to lose more than one drive at the exact same time. Those other concerns — physical loss or other destruction of the NAS — had originally steered me clear from local storage but are no longer an issue. Now that I knew I was going to get some physical storage of my own, there were two options. It was no-frills — just a Linux installation and a Samba setup to access the drive on the network.
Definitely not enough horsepower to do anything beyond that; no longer an issue with today's hardware. However, finding a nice small, quiet case and keeping the software up-to-date sounded like more of a burden than an opportunity. I would have to spend a few weekends to configuring it to do simple things like email me if the RAID array was not healthy.
Weekends that were better spent writing this article instead. I began looking at 4-bay consumer NAS systems. There were largely two companies in this space: Synology and Drobo. It only took a few Google searches to learn that Synology was the better choice with better features, software and disk performance. I stopped considering Drobo after finding a few horror stories of entire disk array corruption and data loss. Synology also seemed more open and had a larger community of folks tinkering with them; Drobo doesn't even have SSH installed by default for example.
While it wasn't my original requirement, I quickly learned that new consumer NAS systems are much, much more than storage. They have great software, automatic updates, mobile apps to control and access your data and more. I could easily use the extra space beyond just Lightroom for a myriad of purposes.
Compatibility and Installation
Definitely the way to go. This kind of setup is not cheap. In particular it has the new 2. And if encryption is important to you, you'll be pleased that this processor supports AES-NI hardware encryption so you don't take a huge performance hit. The USB ports let you connect additional external hard drives for things like recurring backup tasks or simply to share that volume on your network. And yes, you can plug in your printer and share it on the network With current 3. However, while I take a lot of photos, I am not a professional.
Java probleem Safari op Mac opgelost in Surveillance Station 6.3
I do not shoot events or portraits for hours each day. Having that much storage would be overkill for me and I wouldn't come close to filling that up within 5 years. I figure that by the time 5 years rolls around I'll probably want a newer and more performant NAS and hard drives; heck, in 5 years we'll have affordable multi-terabyte SSDs in the 1. I decided to go with 3TB drives. The jump up to 4TB drives was pretty significant in cost so that helped me with the decision.
I have about 1TB of photos and videos to put on it immediately so that gives me plenty of headroom to grow.
As mentioned above, this was the more powerful quad-core, 4-bay NAS I chose. And as an added benefit they're also a bit quieter than their desktop Green edition counterparts. But this is very much optional — the included 2GB of RAM should be more than sufficient for most folks. If your primary machine is a Mac lacking an Ethernet port, you will want to get this so that your initial file transfers are fast and don't take days over Wi-Fi.
While the NAS does come with Ethernet cables, if you will be directly connecting your laptop to your router to do the initial file transfers, you'll want something long enough so you don't have to sit on the floor next to your router. Note: I mentioned a RAM upgrade in this parts list as optional. I do that mainly since the installation process was a huge, huge pain in the ass.
Taking the case off of this thing is very hard. There are little clips keeping it on that you need to prop open with a slender knife. I ended up breaking a few of them while wrestling with the thing for half an hour. I'd suggest not bothering with the RAM upgrade unless you know you'll really be stressing this system. You cannot upgrade the RAM on these models since it is soldered directly on the motherboard. It reminds me of my old Shuttle SFF computers, which are a tad larger.
The Synology's case feels sturdy and substantial, though it is still plastic and has huge Synology logos on both sides which double as vents. However, I was a bit disappointed with the power supply. I understand why they have it external — to reduce heat inside the unit — but it's a 4-pin plug with a thick cable so it's hard to position.
It feels like it wants to fall out It reminds me of the huge power brick the first Mac Mini had that always fell out, but I digress. There are no screws involved. You just lift a tab and pull out the drive mounts. Slide your freshly unboxed hard drives into each one and then pop on the side rails to keep them in place. You'll notice how the drive bays have some rubber grommets for additional vibration dampening.
Since a NAS is headless, you can't just plug a monitor and keyboard into it. You can start by either installing their Synology Assistant Mac app or just by visiting find. I did the latter to find my NAS on the network and began going through the setup flow. One of the first things I noticed while this Synology was up and running was how quiet it was. Sure when the disks are active and working you can hear their clicks, but when they are idle you can barely hear the large rear fans whirring.
The benefit of SHR is that in the future you can mix and match hard drives of different capacities, instead of requiring all disks to be exactly the same. In this 4-drive setup, SHR allows for the complete failure of one of the drives before there would be any data loss. That gives you enough time to pop in a new drive and have the array fix itself. Though there is an option that will allow SHR to have 2 disk fault tolerance if that matters to you.
I'm okay with 1 disk fault tolerance as I plan to back up the NAS itself as well — more on that later. As I mentioned in the parts list above, a RAM upgrade is entirely optional and I actually do not advise it since I found it difficult to actually take the case off to even get to the RAM.
I will spare you the details and just show some pictures. After reassembling the system with the new 8GB stick of RAM, I booted it up and went to the control panel to verify that everything was okay. Before we get started with the main event of transferring all of my photos, videos and other data over to the Synology, I wanted to give a brief tour of the Synology DSM software. This is the "desktop" for the DSM web-based operating system. There is even an option to have the DiskStation email you you can OAuth into your GMail account for everything from security issues and disk array health to reboot notices for upcoming automatic software updates.
You can even enable two-factor authentication for access to your Synology. Assuming you have a decent Internet connection, you can use the VPN server to encrypt your web traffic when at a coffee shop or other such untrusted wireless networks without having to pay for another server or VPN service. Very handy for making your NAS your default download destination. Or if rolling your own is more your flavor, you can install the BitTorrent Sync client in the Package Center.
Similarly, there's Cloud Station which is like a NAS-hosted Dropbox cloud alternative that lets you save up to 32 file revisions for every file in your shared folders — though a fair bit of warning for that; it appears to be unreliable in its current version and tends to dramatically overuse space. In a nutshell, there is a myriad of backup and file-related software that's ready to use on the Synology. If you built your own Linux NAS, you'd have to spend hours in a terminal writing your own scripts or configuring each backup tool to get them up and running.
And then there are the mobile apps for browsing your files, photos, videos and more. Of course, these will only work on your local network unless you configure your DiskStation to be accessible on the Internet. I have opted not to do that for security reasons, but if you want to the Synology DSM software makes that process easy with QuickConnect. Of course you don't need to use any of this software if all you want is simple network file access..
While I'm on the subject of all this included software, I thought I would go a bit deeper into the Synology photo offering, PhotoStation. It's a very capable offering but I only use it for my mobile phone photos. Ever since my first iPhone in , I've been keeping every mobile phone photo and video I've taken. Previously these were just stored on Amazon S3 as I didn't have a need to view them often. I also don't find these older mobile photos important enough — even going back just a few years photo quality is pretty bad and blurry — to mix them in with my Lightroom or Google Photos usage.
So PhotoStation seems like a good silo for these older mobile phone photos. PhotoStation is so tightly integrated with the DSM software that all you have to do is transfer folders of photos to the aptly-named "photo" folder. I dragged about 60GB of mobile media to the photo folder. The NAS slowly processed the photos, transcoded the videos and gave me a handy way to see the progress. The processed thumbnails are stored in another directory so they don't clutter up the photo folder.
PhotoStation is not pretty but gets the job done for photos I rarely need to browse. If you use the mobile app, it can automatically upload your mobile phone media to the Synology as you take them — like Google Photos, but without all the cool features. Okay, now that we've done a little tour of the software, it's time to get to the meat of the setup: moving all my photos and videos over to the Synology. It would take quite a bit longer to complete your transfers over Wi-Fi, even if you're on the latest and greatest As much as I tried to be minimal and not have a proper desktop computer, it's hard to argue with the immense performance boost.
My laptop is now only used for casual couch usage or basic photo importing and editing while traveling, as mentioned in Traveling and photography Part 1. The majority of my videos and RAW photos were stored on Amazon Glacier via the Arq Mac app, so I had to start there and begin the slow and expensive process of downloading my files. Since Glacier gets more expensive the faster you need the files and with the number of simultaneous transfers you have, it took about a week to get all of my files.
And that was still with me rushing the processing and setting aggressive speeds. I had also encrypted my data on Glacier so I could only download them through Arq instead of setting up a script on the NAS to download them. Keep that in mind if you have a ton of data on Glacier and you want to put on your NAS quickly. Now that I had all of my files — well some of them, they consumed all the remaining space on my 1TB SSD so I had to download, transfer, delete and repeat to make room for new downloads — it was time to drag them over.
It's really just that simple.
As I mentioned earlier, I decided to store all photos and videos from my mobile phones separately from all media taken from my GoPro and mirrorless cameras. So all mobile pics go to the default photo folder for use by PhotoStation and I created a new shared folder called Photos to organize my videos and RAW photos for use by Lightroom. You just need to give it a name, but there are additional options like if you want to encrypt the folder.
I opted not to encrypt this particular folder since it's just a bunch of photos I put online anyways and I also did not want to impact performance while accessing and editing these photos. The new shared folder will appear in the Finder and you can just drag files and folders over. I recreated the simple year-based folder structure I've been using for all my Lightroom media:.
However, you only attain those sustained speeds when transferring large files. If you're transferring a bunch of small files, like say a GoPro timelapse with 10, photos, it will take a bit longer. Wait a second — that seems slow for my I assumed this was because I have tons of other I opened up the AirPort Utility to move all of these devices to a separate guest network and leave the primary network just for my iMac. That's so much faster than what I was getting! However, even though I'm just 10 feet away from my router, sometimes the Tx Rate will dip to Mbps.
Definitely fast enough to work with photos stored on the NAS in Lightroom and not be in a world of hurt. Of course, you'll still want to do the initial transfer over Ethernet. It took me about 3 hours combined to transfer 1TB of photos, videos and miscellaneous data.
Now for the real reason I went down this network attached storage path in the first place: establishing a workflow for storing and using my archived RAW photos. I mentioned in Traveling and Photography Part 1 that whenever I'm traveling I always keep two copies of my photos.
I carry about lots of SD memory cards and don't delete them, even after I import photos onto my laptop every day of the trip. Then when I get home I process the photos for a photoset — which often takes many weekends of spare time to cull and adjust. It's only when that is complete that I finally I archive all the RAWs by moving them off of my computer. That used to be cloud storage but now the NAS is the first destination. Sound simple? It is.
But how does this work with the Lightroom catalog and what happens to all the edit metadata? My original thought was that I would export every set of photos as I was done with them by exporting a Lightroom catalog with it to the NAS via the "Export this Folder as a Catalog That way I could have a lightweight Lightroom catalog only filled with items I was currently working on. I quickly learned this will not work: for your safety, Lightroom will not let you open a catalog hosted on a network volume. Not to mention it would be annoying to constantly switch catalogs whenever I wanted to access different sets.
The Lightroom catalog is based on a SQLite database which lacks the ability to lock the database while in use. As such, this could easily lead to corruption if stored on a network drive where it could be accessed at the same time by multiple instances of Lightroom. Adobe decided to protect the user from possible catalog corruption like this. But that requires an expensive and from what I hear buggy iSCSI initiator application and more configuration.. Okay, that's just a long way of saying that I'm going to do the easy thing and just have one large Lightroom catalog locally on my Mac and store the RAWs and videos on the NAS.
Adobe Lightroom knows how to work with network storage volumes. You can import from them, keep photos on them and it shows up as a normal drive. And it doesn't freak out if you're not connected to the NAS; it just shows it as offline. There are a few ways to move your files over to the NAS.
If the photos have not been imported into Lightroom already, you can just go ahead and import them: select the NAS as the volume and make sure to select Add instead of Move in the top options. That way they will remain on the NAS. If the NAS is not showing up, make sure it's connected in Finder and you have already connected to the shared folder where you are storing these photos. If this is your first set of photos imported from the NAS, you will now see the volume listed permanently when in the Library mode.
At first it may only display the name of the subfolder, but you can right-click to specify it show the parent as well: the year folder in this case. Now that the NAS appears in Lightroom, you can easily move folders from the local drive to your Synology by just dragging! Super simple. This is now my core workflow: finish working on some photos and drag them to the NAS to free up some space.
Of course, if just moving files over in the Finder is more your style, you can do that as well. If the photos already existed in Lightroom, the next time you open Lightroom it will not know where the files are, as indicated by a missing folder icon in addition to an exclamation icon on each photo. You can easily fix this by right-clicking on the folder in the left pane while in Library mode and selecting Find Missing Folder A Finder dialog will pop up for you to specify the new folder on the NAS where the photos can be found.
While I used Ethernet for the initial transfers, I would be more than annoyed if I had to use it more often than that and have another cable hanging around in my workspace. First off — the vast majority of my photo editing is done with files on my local drive. I browse archived photos on the NAS occasionally from time to time, for example if I wanted to try out some new process tweaks on a particular photo or more frequently look up photos I took of family or friends that they ask for months later.
As long as the catalog, cache and previews are stored on the local drive with originals remotely, it should only feel a tad slower.